Government Alternatives to Detention

Rather than reduce detention, punitive so-called alternatives such as ankle monitors have instead expanded the number of people under government surveillance

Community based alternatives through case management. Image credit: Jamila Hammami

Alternatives to detention (ATD’s) as defined by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) encompass a wide range of mechanisms to ensure compliance and move immigrants through their immigration court proceedings without detaining them inside detention centers. So far, alternative programming has been implemented mostly by ICE. As an agency whose primary mission is immigration enforcement, ICE’s use of ATD’s has proven to be another route to restrict and surveil immigrants and further alienate immigrant communities.

ICE’s official alternatives or conditions of release currently include:

  • Parole/release on own recognizance
  • Bond
  • Check-ins at ICE offices
  • Home visits and check-ins
  • Telephonic monitoring
  • GPS monitoring through an electronic ankle bracelet

Nearly all of these (excluding bond and parole) are sub-contracted out to subsidiaries of the same private prison companies profiting off immigrant detention. ICE’s largest alternatives to detention program, the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP), is administered by Behavioral Interventions (BI), a GEO Group subsidiary. Private bail bond companies also make money off the imposition of bond, which can be set by either ICE or an immigration judge without consideration of an individual’s ability to pay.

Parole should be more widely used, and current official policy suggests it would apply to nearly everyone who makes it through the initial eligibility screening for asylum. Instead, since late 2014, this policy has been increasingly ignored, leading to the long-term detention of most people seeking asylum.

ICE’s approach to ATDs is entirely in contrast to the researched best practices for alternative programming for both protecting human rights and effectively helping immigrants through their proceedings. Instead of relying on detention or traditional ATDs as administered by ICE, the United States should take a community-based case management approach that provides immigrants that need it the necessary resources to navigate their immigration proceedings.

Although some non-profits have been resourcing these kinds of post-release support, they are not currently included in the government’s officially administered alternatives and have not seen federal investment. Instead ICE is creating programming that is not community-based, lacks any case management support in favor of harmful surveillance tactics and restrictive technology (ankle monitors), and fails to recognize the dignity and humanity of participants.

As a basic litmus test for whether or not they are being used correctly, alternatives must always decrease the number of people in detention. Instead, ICE’s programs have been employed as a supplement to incarceration to increase surveillance of immigrant communities. As ICE’s budget for alternatives to detention has increased, so has its budget for detention. In 2019, ICE received $184 million in taxpayer dollars to operate and expand a massive ATD program, but without direction to abide by best practices for alternatives and only alongside another $3.1 billion for the ever-growing detention system.